Mararu & Mararu SCA stands as Romania's boutique powerhouse for energy and natural resources law, blending 22 years of expertise with forward-looking strategies amid the renewables surge, grid modernization, and EU Green Deal imperatives. We deliver exquisitely tailored solutions for international and multinationals entities, addressing fossil-to-green transitions, climate resilience, and sustainable financing, positioning clients to thrive in Romania's €X billion sector targeting 30%+ renewables by 2030 while mitigating environmental and regulatory risks.
We're here to serve international clients in Romania's energy market, projected to grow with renewables leading post-2025 fossil phase-outs, on matters such as
and given our niche expertise, on cross-sectoral matters such as:
Typicly, our clients are
Defending Western Capital, Insulating Assets, and Unblocking Permitting Pipelines on the NATO Eastern Flank
The multi-billion-dollar realignment of global supply chains under the "Friend-Shoring" doctrine has transformed Romania's subsoil and metallurgical infrastructure into high-stakes arenas for geopolitical and commercial friction. For Wall Street private equity, international investment banking syndicates, and corporate buyers, entry into this highly regulated landscape carries a parallel expansion of complex litigation risk.
At Mararu & Mararu SCA, our Contentious Mandates Practice functions not merely as courtroom litigators, but as clinical risk mitigators and aggressive defenders of transnational capital. We operate at the high-stakes intersection of administrative law, transnational financial restructuring, environmental law, and antitrust defense.
Our bespoke litigation practice, expertise and capabilities are designed specifically to protect institutional resources from the localized bottlenecks, weaponized civil procedures, and adversarial capital interventions that threaten project bankability.
Strategic Practice Verticals & Contentious Practice
The most critical threat to the deployment timeline of any mining or metallurgical asset in Romania is the systemic disruption of the environmental permitting pipeline. Well-funded non-governmental organizations (NGOs) increasingly exploit Romanian Administrative Litigation Law (Law no. 554/2004) to achieve automatic or judicial suspensions of crucial Environmental Agreements (Acorduri de Mediu) issued by local Environmental Protection Agencies (APMs).
Following the March 2026 Amendments to Government Emergency Ordinance (GEO) no. 46/2022, Romania’s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening regime stands as one of the most expansive and intricate in Central and Eastern Europe. With mandatory filing thresholds adjusted to €5 million alongside strict 12-month aggregation rules, even asset acquisitions and new Greenfield entities within sensitive sectors – including critical minerals, dual-use defense tech, and transport security – are exposed to regulatory delays or conditional approvals.
FDI Filing Disruption ──► CEISD / CSAT Risk Veto ──► Administrative Appeal ──► High Court (ICCJ) Special Mandate
The financialization of supply chains via Pre-Export Finance (PXF) structures, structured debts, and royalty streaming agreements introduces sophisticated transactional friction when project developers underperform or breach representations and warranties. Because Romanian constitutional law declares the subsoil the exclusive property of the state, traditional mortgage foreclosures on underground deposits are legally impossible.
To secure exclusive production rights and block adversarial capital from infiltrating the cap table, Western buyers utilize long-term exclusive Offtake Agreements. However, these agreements face a high probability of antitrust challenges by competitive operators or state-backed trading monopolies alleging violations of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) or predatory market abuse.
Mining operators face an evolving domestic regulatory environment, illustrated by the recent adoption of Government Decision No. 391/2026, which dramatically updated annual mining activity fees for prospecting, exploration, and exploitation under Mining Law No. 85/2003.
An exploitation license from NAMR does not grant immediate surface entry. Mining infrastructure requires the conversion of highly fragmented agricultural or forested plots (fond forestier) into industrial zoning. Local municipal councils frequently stall the approval of Zonal Urban Plans (PUZ), or the Ministry of Agriculture creates bureaucratic resistance during the Permanent Removal from the Agricultural Circuit (Scoaterea din circuitul agricol) under Law no. 18/1991.
Agricultural Circuit ──► PUZ Litigation & Mandate to Approve ──► Industrial/Mining Zoning Realized
"We do not wait for a project to be paralyzed by an administrative court. We view litigation as an integrated asset management tool. By tracking environmental, corporate, and regulatory friction years before it reaches a trial stage, we ensure that our clients’ legal architectures are built to survive the aggressive realities of Eastern European natural resources contention."
— Mararu & Mararu SCA, Contentious Mandates Practice