Originally published: August 9, 2025, on LAWinSPACE.com, a Mararu & Mararu SCA AeroSpace Law Blog
Amid the sun-scorched dunes of Boca Chica, Texas, where the Rio Grande carves an indelible frontier between human ambition's reach toward the cosmos and the unyielding sovereignty of nations, SpaceX's Starship upper stage met an untimely demise on June 18, 2025. A pressurization failure during ground testing shattered the vessel, scattering inert debris across Mexican territorial waters and shores, thereby kindling a legal conflagration over accountability in the era of private space exploration.
This episode evokes historical precedents of cross-border industrial harms, such as the Trail Smelter arbitration, where fumes from a Canadian smelter inflicted damage upon U.S. lands, establishing a foundational principle of state responsibility for transboundary pollution (United States v. Canada, 3 R.I.A.A. 1905 - Arb. Trib. 1941). Drawing upon evidentiary records, including debris patterns devoid of proven toxicity and thwarted salvage operations amid diplomatic frictions, this analysis posits that terrestrial legal regimes, bolstered by bilateral accords, eclipse outer space treaties in governing such pre-launch anomalies.
From a Romanian vantage, informed by Romania's integration into the European Union's space governance framework under Regulation (EU) 2021/696 establishing the Union Space Programme (May 12, 2021), this incident underscores the perils of regulatory fragmentation while highlighting prospects for harmonized protocols that propel innovation without compromising environmental stewardship or interstate relations.
As of August 5, 2025, official reports and corroborated media accounts delineate the sequence: at SpaceX's Starbase facility, a nitrogen tank rupture in the forward dome of Starship prototype Ship 36 during a static pressurization test resulted in the expulsion of roughly two tons of metallic fragments, insulation debris, and structural remnants. These materials traversed approximately 40 kilometres, landing in the Gulf of America (formerly known as Gulf of Mexico) and along Tamaulipas coastlines (Reuters, June 26, 2025; The New York Times, June 28, 2025).
While no casualties were reported, and SpaceX's initial evaluations confirmed the absence of hazardous substances, Mexican environmental advocates linked the incident to localized marine mortality events involving fish, dolphins, and sea turtle, allegations unsupported by rigorous, peer-reviewed studies (Los Angeles Times, June 27, 2025).
Salvage operations encountered significant hurdles. SpaceX's offshore platforms faced denials from Mexican authorities, leading to invocations of bilateral environmental cooperation mechanisms, even as Mexico levied administrative penalties by July 2025 for purported breaches of the Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente [General Law on Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection], art. 170 (Mex. 1988, as amended) (Al Jazeera, June 27, 2025; Space.com, June 27, 2025).
By mid-July, SpaceX recovered one ton of detritus from 12 nautical miles offshore, yet Mexican officials persisted in critiques of adherence to global norms, intensifying scrutiny of potential ecological repercussions (CryptoCoach X Post, July 24, 2025; CuriousCats.ai X Post, July 24, 2025).
Concurrently, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) finalized its investigation by early August, exonerating SpaceX from procedural violations under 14 C.F.R. § 450.171 (2025) and authorizing Flight 10 for late August, thereby affirming the venture's robustness despite geopolitical strains (Corpus Christi Caller-Times, June 30, 2025).
Given its terrestrial confines, a pre-launch malfunction on private grounds without orbital insertion, the anomaly eludes the purview of core space law instruments. The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (opened for signature Jan. 27, 1967, entered into force Oct. 10, 1967, 18 U.S.T. 2410, 610 U.N.T.S. 205), and the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (opened for signature Mar. 29, 1972, entered into force Sept. 1, 1972, 24 U.S.T. 2389, 961 U.N.T.S. 187), predicate liability on "space objects" launched or intended for outer space (Liability Convention art. I(c)), criteria unfulfilled in this static test scenario.
Mexico, having signed the Outer Space Treaty on January 27, 1967 (ratified January 31, 1968), acceded to the Liability Convention via ratification on April 8, 1974, and joined the Artemis Accords on December 20, 2021, thereby sharing in these international commitments; yet the incident's non-orbital nature precludes their direct application, underscoring reliance on fault-based terrestrial regimes.
Analogous cases, like the 1978 Cosmos 954 satellite disintegration, which prompted a $3 million Canadian claim under the Liability Convention's rare activation (Claim of Canada Against the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics for Damage Caused by Cosmos 954, 18 I.L.M. 899 (1979)), underscore absolute liability for radioactive orbital debris but prove inapposite absent similar hazards or celestial origins.
Terrestrial doctrines prevail instead. In the United States, the Commercial Space Launch Act (51 U.S.C. §§ 50901–50923 (2018)) empowers FAA oversight, framing the event as a negligence-based mishap requiring environmental reviews. Cross-border ramifications engage Mexico's domestic environmental laws and the U.S.-Mexico Agreement on Cooperation for the Protection and Improvement of the Environment in the Border Area (signed Aug. 14, 1983, entered into force Feb. 16, 1984, T.I.A.S. No. 10827) [La Paz Agreement], enabling collaborative probes and fault-attributed remedies for unverified damages. Customary international norms on transboundary harm, as enshrined in Trail Smelter, supra, mandate due diligence, with potential recourse to arbitration through bodies like the Permanent Court of Arbitration should negotiations falter.
From Romania's perspective, as an EU member state adhering to Regulation (EU) 2021/696 which promotes sustainable space activities and international cooperation (art. 3), this framework encourages neutral mediation, drawing on Romania's historical role in multilateral space diplomacy to advocate for equitable resolutions that align private innovation with regional sustainability imperatives.
Mexico's stance, voiced by President Claudia Sheinbaum on June 25, 2025, asserts presumptive pollution under national statutes, buttressed by activist documentation of debris-related ecological disturbances to justify penalties and reparations (The Guardian, June 25, 2025 [theguardian.com]; USA Today, July 10, 2025)[usatoday.com].
However, probative deficiencies, mere associations lacking causal validation from independent analyses, undermine such assertions, inviting arbitral rejection for evidentiary insufficiency.
SpaceX's rebuttal emphasizes diligence: expeditious recovery initiatives, impeded by bureaucratic barriers, comport with La Paz Agreement obligations, potentially reallocating blame toward Mexican obstructions (Reuters, June 26, 2025).
This defense is fortified by innovation's exigencies. Iterative prototyping advances interstellar objectives, with risks near borders tempered by FAA-sanctioned safeguards, presumptively outweighing conjectural injuries.
In the vast theater of human endeavor, where the Rio Grande murmurs secrets of borders both earthly and ethereal, the June 18, 2025 rupture of SpaceX's Starship prototype Ship 36 at Boca Chica, Texas, emerges not merely as a technical mishap but as a crucible for interstellar jurisprudence.
As metallic shards danced across the Gulf of America's azure expanse, alighting upon Mexican shores like fallen stars, they ignited a transboundary dispute that echoes the ancient Roman maxim “sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas” - use your own so as not to harm another's.
Yet, amid this debris-strewn discord, a beacon flickers: the Artemis Accords, those non-binding harbingers of cooperative exploration, beckoning wise leaders to transcend sovereign squabbles in pursuit of humanity's multiplanetary destiny. Herein lies the debate: can such ethereal commitments, unbound by the chains of treaty law, forge durable alliances? Or do they dissolve like cosmic dust in the face of geopolitical friction? Drawing upon evidentiary precedents and legal scholarship, this examination posits a resolution wherein the Accords' spirit animates bilateral mechanisms, mitigating risks while propelling innovation toward the stars.
Proponents of leveraging the Artemis Accords in this fray argue that their non-binding essence is not a frailty but a virtue, enabling agile adaptation in the fluid realm of space governance. Established on October 13, 2020, by NASA and initial signatories including the United States and Mexico (which acceded on December 20, 2021), the Accords articulate principles grounded in the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, fostering transparency, interoperability, and sustainable practices for civil exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
Section 11, addressing deconfliction of activities, mandates avoidance of harmful interference through safety zones and mutual consultation, while Section 12 explicitly commits signatories to orbital debris mitigation via safe disposal and risk minimization - principles extensible to pre-launch anomalies where ground-based failures spawn transboundary harms.
In the spirit of humanity's advancement, these provisions transcend their lunar focus, offering a normative blueprint for disputes like the Starship incident. Consider the evidentiary chronicle: SpaceX's nitrogen tank failure expelled inert debris across 40 kilometers, prompting Mexican claims of ecological disruption under the Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente, yet unsubstantiated by causal proof.
Here, the Accords' emphasis on collaborative risk assessment could guide dialogues under the 1983 La Paz Agreement, transforming adversarial penalties into joint salvage protocols.
Historical analogies bolster this view: the 1978 Cosmos 954 incident, where Soviet debris prompted a Canadian claim under the Liability Convention, resolved through negotiation rather than litigation, illustrating how non-binding norms evolve into customary practice.
Similarly, the Accords have facilitated real-world cooperation, as seen in NASA's Artemis Program partnerships, where signatories like Australia and Canada coordinate resource utilization, averting conflicts and advancing shared goals.
From a lawyer's vantage, non-binding instruments fill lacunae in binding treaties, as articulated in scholarly discourse. They serve as "guidelines to orient themselves" in grey areas of space law, promoting due diligence without the rigidity of ratification. In this incident, invoking the Accords' debris mitigation ethos could preempt escalation, aligning with the United Nations' Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (U.N. Doc. A/74/20, Annex II, 2019), which advocate interdisciplinary synergies (e.g. AI-enhanced anomaly forecasting - Para. 72 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 Recitals), echoing Romania's EU-informed perspective under Regulation (EU) 2021/696.
Thus, wise leaders, cognizant of risks inherent in multiplanetary pursuits, might harness this framework to convert disruption into synergy, as President Claudia Sheinbaum's assertions of pollution yield to cooperative probes, fostering alliances that propel humanity's stellar odyssey.
Skeptics, however, contend that the Accords' non-binding nature renders them impotent in high-stakes conflicts, where sovereign interests clash like meteors in orbital paths. As political commitments ineligible for U.N. Charter Article 102 registration, they lack enforcement mechanisms, relying on voluntary compliance that falters amid diplomatic strains. In the Starship odyssey, Mexico's administrative penalties and salvage denials underscore this: absent legal teeth, the Accords cannot compel recovery operations or override domestic laws like Article 170 of Mexico's environmental statute. Critics cite potential for exacerbating tensions, as noted in analyses of the Accords' reception: while allies embrace them, competitors view them as escalatory, potentially deepening divides rather than bridging them.
Evidentiary deficiencies further erode efficacy: the Accords' orbital focus ill-fits pre-launch terrestrial mishaps, where fault-based regimes under the Commercial Space Launch Act (51 U.S.C. §§ 50901–50923) and customary norms from Trail Smelter (United States v. Canada, 3 R.I.A.A. 1905 - Arb. Trib. 1941) prevail. Non-binding agreements, while influential in evolving norms, evident in their role since the 1980s to govern space activities, risk dilution when states prioritize national prerogatives over humanity's collective aspirations. In this vein, the multiplanetary goal, though noble, encounters pragmatic hurdles: risks, as in the unverified marine mortality claims, demand verifiable remedies, not aspirational rhetoric.
Yet, from this dialectic emerges a solution: integrating the Artemis Accords' principles into enforceable bilateral instruments, transmuting non-binding spirit into binding action. Under the La Paz Agreement's cooperative framework, the U.S. and Mexico could negotiate a supplemental protocol referencing Accords Sections 11 and 12, mandating joint debris mitigation plans for border-adjacent space activities. This would encompass AI-driven predictive tools, supra, consistent with EU Regulation 2021/696 edicts, to forecast anomalies and allocate liabilities based on due diligence, bolstering SpaceX's defenses while addressing Mexico's concerns.
Such a trajectory aligns with precedents like the Accords' facilitation of interoperability in Artemis missions, where non-binding norms underpin operational agreements. Wise leaders, envisioning multiplanetary life as humanity's lodestar, must embrace risks as crucibles for growth: by convening under U.N. auspices, invoking the Accords' transparency mandates, parties could establish an interdisciplinary panel, merging space law experts, environmental scientists, and innovators, to draft guidelines preempting future incidents. This not only resolves the Starship conflagration but elevates it to a cornerstone of equitable progress, where borders dissolve in the infinite expanse, and humanity's gaze turns united toward the cosmos.
This examination casts the Starship rupture as a forge for jurisprudential evolution, wherein threats of severed ties give way to vistas of integrated progress, forged through diplomatic instruments that elevate innovation beyond the pall of unfounded apprehensions.
1. Pre-orbital classifications invoke fault-oriented terrestrial laws over space treaties.
2. Probative lacunae moderate assertions, bolstering defenses rooted in due care.
3. Instruments like the Artemis Accords and EU frameworks spur negotiations, converting incidents into cornerstones of cooperative advancement.
This analysis is offered as tribute to the memory and enduring legacy of my great-great-uncle, Nicolae Șerban de Voila, a principled lawyer and diplomat whose career exemplified the pursuit of equitable solutions within challenging imperial frameworks. It also commemorates his esteemed friend, Lord Salisbury, whose profound diplomatic acumen shaped the course of international relations in an era of seminal transformation. Their bond, forged through shared intellectual discourse (and leisurely pursuits, hunting in Transylvanian forests), stands as a testament to the power of alliances in advancing mutual understanding and peaceful diplomacy, principles that resonate deeply with the Artemis Accords and the imperative for collaborative resolutions in contemporary global affairs.
Amala Mararu, née Șerban, August 9, 2025, Otopeni, Romania
Uncover Romania's aerospace heritage: Vlaicu's 1910 flight, Coandă's jet invention, IAR-14 fighters, and Protopopescu's daring designs. Ignite modern space ventures with Mararu & Mararu, Bucharest's trailblazing space law firm, channeling grit into stellar success.
Romania: Aerospace's untapped EU powerhouse with 30-50% lower engineering costs, booming €6B IT sector, and Artemis Accords synergy. Unlock R&D subsidies, NATO-secure markets, and sustainable innovation via Mararu & Mararu's expert FDI guidance for stellar returns.
.svg)
Partner with Mararu & Mararu SCA to advance your aviation, space, and defense capabilities and initiatives. We provide game-changing and strategic legal support and frameworks that enable fearless innovation, effortless regulatory adherence, and mission-critical achievements — strengthening operational endurance and sector dominance. Launch Your Strategy
Connect today to chart the path forward.
